A free, private check of your manuscript against the ACCEE 2027 template — before anyone else sees it.
Formatting is the most common reason a paper goes back to its author — and it is the easiest thing to fix. Upload your Word file and in a few seconds you get a plain-language list of everything that does not match the official ACCEE 2027 template, with the exact fix for each item.
This is not a submission and not a review. Nothing you upload here reaches the committee or the reviewers, and the result has no effect on the decision about your paper. It is a private tool for you, and you can run it as many times as you like.
We ran this checker over 95 real Word manuscripts submitted to a comparable IEEE-format conference. Only six of them had no formatting problem at all. Four issues came up again and again:
None of this says anything about the quality of the research. But each one costs the author an e-mail, a correction round and a few days — and close to a deadline, that is exactly the time nobody has. Two minutes on this page removes them before they ever become a problem.
All of it comes from one place: the official ACCEE 2027 Word template. The checker compares your file against that template — it does not invent rules of its own.
Page size, all four margins, the two-column layout, column gap and line spacing.
Body font and size, and whether the paper actually uses the template's styles for the title, headings, abstract, keywords and captions.
Title, the centered author block, affiliation and e-mail lines, abstract, keywords, and the conference header on the first page.
Whether the reference list uses the template style and whether the numbering follows the IEEE rule: [1] is the first work cited in the text.
The real resolution of every figure at the size it is printed, whether a small image was enlarged until it went blurry, and whether captions use “Fig. 1” rather than “Graph 1”.
Template placeholder text still sitting in the paper (“given name surname”, “email address or ORCID”…), page numbers that should not be there, and your page count against the fee rule.
Your file is sent to the conference's own checking service over an encrypted connection, opened there, and removed as soon as the check is finished. It is never added to your submission and never published.
The text extracted from your paper stays in the service's memory for up to four hours — only so the assistant under your report can quote your own paragraphs back to you while you discuss the findings. After that it is discarded. Nothing is written to a database, and there is no account to delete.
Two parts of the check use a language model through the Anthropic API: the optional language review, and a short automated screen that checks the topic of the paper against the conference's content policy. In both cases only the text of your manuscript is sent, and only for that analysis.
No. It is a courtesy tool. It is strongly recommended, because the problems it finds are exactly the ones that would otherwise come back to you later — but your submission is valid whether or not you use it.
Yes — it is converted automatically before checking. One limitation: converted files do not carry a page count, so the page/fee note is skipped for them. Please prepare the final manuscript as .docx.
That is allowed. The first six pages are included in the registration fee and every page after that costs 50 USD; there is no upper limit. The checker simply tells you the page count and the extra fee so there is no surprise later. See the registration page for the fee table.
Two common causes. Either the header line was typed into the body text instead of the Word header area (View → Header & Footer), or the paper was built from another conference's template and still carries that conference's header. The report tells you which one it found.
Yes. Papers with military, political or terrorism-related subject matter are not accepted in any form. The checker screens for this, and if it is triggered you are told directly instead of receiving a format report. Engineering work that merely mentions security, defence mechanisms, drones, radar or satellites is not affected — the screen looks at what the paper is about.
Yes, as often as you need — it is free. There is a fair-use limit of 20 checks per hour from the same network connection, which no normal author reaches.
No. It means the manuscript matches the template and reads well enough for the automated checks. Acceptance is decided by peer review on the strength of the work itself.
It takes a few seconds, it is free, and nobody but you sees the result.
